So the second debate just ended and I’m currently listening to the NPR follow-up from NPR.org. It’s interesting, and I can’t help but feeling that neither candidate is really great. Is politics always about choosing from the lesser of two evils? I’m inclined toward Kerry simply because I really, really don’t like Bush, especially his decision to go to war. Even without the near proof we now have that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, I think it was a bad idea. Was Sadaam that much of a threat? Or was Bush reaching for something to distract us.